DESIGNING EDUCATION
|
DBE Principle |
Integration
with Geriatric Care in Bali Topics |
|
Self-Action Learning |
Students actively investigate
issues related to ageing in Bali and compare them with the Netherlands
through group projects. Through topics such as Trend and Issues of
Elderly in Bali, Ethical Aspects of Caring for Older People,
and Problem-Based Learning: Ethical Aspects and Technology,
students are encouraged to develop recommendations that contribute to
improving elderly care and promoting the well-being of older adults. |
|
Collaborative Learning |
Students work in multicultural
groups consisting of local and international students to complete comparative
projects on nursing homes, community-based care, and complementary therapies.
Learning occurs through discussion, peer feedback, group presentations, and
shared reflection. Topics supporting this principle include Community-Based
Geriatric Care in Bali, Institutional-Based Geriatric Care in
Bali, and all comparative group assignments. |
|
Contextual Learning |
Learning takes place in
authentic settings where students observe real-life elderly care practices.
Through Visit Nursing Home (PSTW Wana Seraya) and Visit
Posyandu, students connect theoretical concepts with actual healthcare
delivery systems, cultural practices, and the lived experiences of older
adults in Bali. Topics such as Elderly Living in Bali, Most
Common Diseases in Balinese Older People, and Indonesian Health
Care System and Elderly Care Policies further strengthen contextual
understanding. |
|
Constructive Learning |
Students build new knowledge by
integrating classroom learning, field observations, intercultural
discussions, and reflection. Through topics such as Communicate with
the Elderly, Psychosocial and Spiritual Issues in Balinese Older
People, and Ethical Aspects of Caring for Older People,
students critically reflect on their experiences and compare different
perspectives from Indonesia and the Netherlands. Reflection activities help
students construct deeper understanding and professional insights. |
|
Designerly Learning |
Students design innovative and
evidence-based solutions to address challenges in elderly care. Through Problem-Based
Learning: Ethical Aspects and Technology, Complementary Therapy
for Elderly in Bali, and comparative projects, students analyze existing
systems and propose improvements or innovative approaches for geriatric care.
This process encourages creativity, critical thinking, and transformative
problem-solving. |
Redesign on the subject of Geriatric Care in Bali also adopts the Double Diamond Model, which outlines the four key stages of the design process: exploring the problem (Discover), defining the problem (Define), developing the solution (Developing), and delivering the solution (Deliver).
|
Stage |
Topic |
Teaching
Methods |
Learning
Activities & Outputs |
|
Discover |
|
Interactive lectures,
intercultural discussions, observation, interviews, literature review |
Students explore the
characteristics of ageing in Bali, identify cultural influences on elderly
care, investigate current issues affecting older adults, and learn effective communication strategies. |
|
Field trip, observation, guided
interviews, reflective notes |
Students collect authentic data
and observations about institutional and community-based elderly care
services. |
|
|
Define |
|
Group discussions, comparative
analysis, problem identification, concept mapping |
Students analyze findings from
field visits and identify strengths, challenges, and opportunities within
elderly care systems. |
|
Case-based learning, ethical
analysis, brainstorming |
Students define key healthcare,
ethical, and policy-related issues affecting older adults in Bali. |
|
|
Develop |
|
Collaborative learning, design
thinking workshop, literature review, group project |
Students develop potential
solutions, recommendations, or comparative analyses regarding elderly care
practices, workforce development, and complementary interventions. |
|
Comparative
Group Assignment:
|
Collaborative project,
intercultural teamwork, peer learning |
Students design and prepare
comparative presentations and evidence-based recommendations. |
|
|
Deliver |
Problem-Based
Learning Results: Ethical Aspects and Technology |
Presentation, peer feedback,
reflection, discussion |
Students present proposed
solutions and ethical analyses related to elderly care and healthcare
technology. |
|
Final
Comparative Project Presentation |
Group presentation, peer
assessment, self-reflection |
Students communicate findings,
justify recommendations, receive feedback, and reflect on intercultural and
professional learning outcomes. |
Learning Arch of Health and Harmony Minor 2026
1. Discover Stage
Implementation
The Discover stage was designed to help students gain a
broad understanding of ageing in Bali and explore the social, cultural,
psychosocial, spiritual, and healthcare-related factors affecting older adults.
Students were introduced to topics such as Elderly Living in Bali, Trend
and Issues of Elderly in Bali, Communication with Older Adults, and
common psychosocial and spiritual issues experienced by Balinese older people.
To deepen their understanding, students participated in
field visits to a nursing home (PSTW Wana Seraya) and a community health
service (Posyandu). Through observation, interviews, and interaction with older
adults and healthcare providers, students gathered authentic information about
the lived experiences of older people and the healthcare services available to
them.
Lecturer's Role
2. Define Stage
Implementation
During the Define stage, students analyzed information
gathered from literature, classroom discussions, and field observations. They
explored topics such as institutional-based geriatric care, community-based
geriatric care, Indonesian healthcare policies, ethical aspects of elderly
care, and common physical health conditions among older adults.
Students worked collaboratively to identify key challenges,
strengths, and opportunities within elderly care systems. Through case analyses
and group discussions, they formulated problem statements and identified areas
requiring improvement or further investigation.
Lecturer's Role
My role was to facilitate critical thinking and
help students synthesize information from multiple sources. I guided students
in analyzing evidence, questioning assumptions, and connecting observations
with theoretical concepts. Through questioning techniques and structured
discussions, I encouraged students to define meaningful issues that could be
explored further in the next stage.
3. Develop Stage
Implementation
At the Develop stage, students generated ideas and developed
evidence-based recommendations through collaborative and comparative learning
activities. Topics such as complementary therapy for older adults and nursing
workforce development provided opportunities for students to explore innovative
approaches to elderly care.
Students worked in multicultural groups to compare
healthcare systems, nursing home services, community-based care, and
complementary interventions in Bali/Indonesia and the Netherlands. They
developed presentations and recommendations based on literature, field
observations, and intercultural discussions.
Lecturer's Role
As a facilitator, I encouraged creativity, collaboration,
and evidence-informed decision-making. I supported students in exploring
multiple perspectives, integrating theoretical and practical knowledge, and
developing feasible recommendations. I also provided formative feedback
throughout the process to help students refine their ideas and strengthen their
analyses.
4. Deliver Stage
Implementation
In the Deliver stage, students presented the outcomes of
their comparative projects and problem-based learning activities. They shared
findings related to ethical issues, technology in elderly care, healthcare
systems, and complementary interventions. Students justified their
recommendations using evidence gathered throughout the course and reflected on
their learning experiences. Peer feedback, group discussions, and self-reflection
activities were incorporated to promote critical evaluation and continuous
learning.
Lecturer's Role
My role was to facilitate knowledge sharing, reflection, and
constructive feedback. I encouraged students to articulate their reasoning,
defend their recommendations, and critically evaluate both their own work and
that of their peers. I also guided reflective discussions to help students
connect their learning experiences with future professional practice in
geriatric nursing.
Reflection:
Through the BDSQ course, I became more aware of the importance of educational design and the role of Design-Based Education in creating meaningful learning experiences. Consequently, I redesigned the course using the Double Diamond Model to provide a more systematic and student-centered learning process. The Discover stage enables students to explore the realities of ageing in Bali through cultural, psychosocial, healthcare, and community perspectives. The Define stage supports students in identifying key challenges and opportunities related to elderly care. During the Develop stage, students generate ideas and compare practices between Bali/Indonesia and the Netherlands, while the Deliver stage allows them to present evidence-based recommendations and innovative solutions.
This redesign aligns closely with the learning outcome of exploring innovation through design thinking. Rather than simply acquiring knowledge about geriatric care, students are guided to investigate authentic issues, compare different cultural and healthcare contexts, and develop insights that go beyond existing practices and regulations. By examining similarities and differences between Bali and the Netherlands in areas such as culture, healthcare systems, prevention, technology, and well-being, students are encouraged to think critically about how each context can learn from the other.
I observed that the redesigned structure created greater opportunities for collaborative learning, intercultural dialogue, reflection, and creative problem-solving. Students became more actively engaged in analyzing real-world issues and developing recommendations for sustainable and future-oriented health and well-being solutions. The comparative assignments and problem-based learning activities helped students move beyond descriptive learning toward innovation-oriented thinking.
As an educator, this experience shifted my perspective from organizing teaching around content delivery to designing a coherent learning journey that supports inquiry, reflection, and innovation. The Double Diamond framework provided a clear structure for aligning learning activities with intended learning outcomes and strengthened my ability to facilitate transformative learning experiences. Moving forward, I intend to continue refining the course design to further enhance students' capacity to develop innovative, culturally responsive, and sustainable solutions for future healthcare challenges.
References:
Li, Y. (2024). Foundation course design based on Double-Diamond model theory. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Financial Management, Humanities and Social Sciences (ICFMHSS 2024). Atlantis Press.
Day, I. N. Z., Assen, H. J. H. E., Stevens, T. M., & Vermunt, J. D. (2025). Practice what you preach: Lecturers learning about design-based education. Innovative Higher Education, 51, 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09804-1.
Comments
Post a Comment